I [the founder] have been keeping hand-written notes on all things neuroscience for ~20 years.
(In olden days this was record-keeping of all things "biological psychology.")
As my research focus became more molecular biology based, these notes evolved into ≥ 50 % gene findings.
Additionally, the origin of CMK Data is laboratories offering up "analyzed" bioinformatic data and
asking "What do I do with this? Can you help?" "What does this mean?"
A few things became clear from looking at these datasets across neuroscience-related diseases:
- "Analyzed" data is anything but. Rather, it is processed data, which is not ideal for publication on its own.
- Genes repeatedly appear across neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, and acute neuronal injury conditions.
Annotation databases link to housekeeping biochemical processes or molecular function.
My current hypothesis is that these are more neuroscience-related than disease-related, however there are no annotations for either,
so this can't be determined.
- A single brain is just not computationally capable of detecting the patterns needed to uncover neuroscience-specific
annotations. There needs to be a central repository of notes and research as well as scientists across diseases looking at the information.
On the whole, something like spBRAINghetti has been a long time coming in my work and a long time needed in general.
CMK Data has the resources to make this a reality,
primarily obsessiveness in accuracy and the need to be thorough.